The engine's answer

Best lens for landscapes, under €3,000

Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II

100% match

The white workhorse, finally featherweight

Why it wins here

The Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II takes this question at €2,800 — €200 under the €3,000 ceiling — with a 100% match against 65 current lenses. For landscapes the engine leans on sharpness and build & sealing: it scores 94/100 and 90/100, where the pool averages 82/100 and 68/100. At 1045 g it is heavier than the average lens here (633 g). No prime-or-zoom preference was required, so the whole pool of 65 was in play.

The dimensions where it beats the rest of the field by the most, for this question specifically.

  • Use
  • Budget

What's good

  • Kilogram-class 70-200/2.8 with flawless AF
  • Event and portrait pro default

What to watch

  • Costs as much as a good body
  • Still conspicuous — white paint included

What came close — and what each gave up

Questions this answer raises

Is the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II within a €3,000 budget?
Yes. At €2,800 it leaves €200 of the ceiling unspent; the Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II costs €2,300 and the Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS costs €2,300.
How good is the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II for landscapes?
On the use question it scores 100%, 37 points above the average of the 65 lenses ranked. Its strongest numbers for this use are sharpness (94/100) and build & sealing (90/100).
What comes closest to the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM II for landscapes?
The Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at 99%, then the Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS at 99%. The section above names the measure each one lost on.

Change an assumption

This page answers one photographer's question. Yours is not that question — adjust the subject, the format or the budget and watch the whole field re-rank.

Answer for your own shooting