The engine's answer

Best lens for macro, under €3,000

Nikon Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S

100% match

The macro that portrait shooters steal

Why it wins here

The Nikon Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S takes this question at €1,100 — €1,900 under the €3,000 ceiling — with a 100% match against 65 current lenses. For macro the engine leans on close focus and sharpness: it scores 1.00 × mag. and 94/100, where the pool averages 0.33 × mag. and 82/100. At 630 g it is lighter than the average lens here (633 g). No prime-or-zoom preference was required, so the whole pool of 65 was in play.

The dimensions where it beats the rest of the field by the most, for this question specifically.

  • Use
  • Budget

What's good

  • Bitingly sharp at 1:1, gorgeous at f/2.8
  • Synchronised VR with IBIS bodies

What to watch

  • Focus breathing at close range
  • AF slows hunting tiny subjects

What came close — and what each gave up

Questions this answer raises

Is the Nikon Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S within a €3,000 budget?
Yes. At €1,100 it leaves €1,900 of the ceiling unspent; the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS costs €1,500 and the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art costs €800.
How good is the Nikon Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for macro?
On the use question it scores 100%, 82 points above the average of the 65 lenses ranked. Its strongest numbers for this use are close focus (1.00 × mag.) and sharpness (94/100).
What comes closest to the Nikon Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for macro?
The Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS at 99%, then the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art at 99%. The section above names the measure each one lost on.

Change an assumption

This page answers one photographer's question. Yours is not that question — adjust the subject, the format or the budget and watch the whole field re-rank.

Answer for your own shooting