The engine's answer

Best lens for video work, under €1,000

Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II

89% match

The 70-200 look at a third of the weight

Why it wins here

The Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II takes this question at €1,000 — exactly at the €1,000 ceiling — with a 89% match against 65 current lenses. For video work the engine leans on AF speed and stabilisation: it scores 74/100 and 85/100, where the pool averages 74/100 and 34/100. At 357 g it is lighter than the average lens here (633 g). No prime-or-zoom preference was required, so the whole pool of 65 was in play.

The dimensions where it beats the rest of the field by the most, for this question specifically.

  • Budget
  • Use

What's good

  • A sealed 70-200-equivalent at 357 g
  • Dual IS keeps event shutter speeds honest

What to watch

  • Equivalent blur is f/5.6-ish
  • Weak close-focus for detail shots

What came close — and what each gave up

Questions this answer raises

Is the Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II within a €1,000 budget?
Yes — at €1,000 it lands exactly on the ceiling, with nothing left over; the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR costs €830 and the Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS costs €950.
How good is the Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II for video work?
On the use question it scores 78%, 28 points above the average of the 65 lenses ranked. Its strongest numbers for this use are AF speed (74/100) and stabilisation (85/100).
What comes closest to the Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II for video work?
The Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR at 88%, then the Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS at 87%. The section above names the measure each one lost on.

Change an assumption

This page answers one photographer's question. Yours is not that question — adjust the subject, the format or the budget and watch the whole field re-rank.

Answer for your own shooting