The engine's answer

Best lens for landscapes, under €1,000

Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art

94% match

Life-size detail with Art-line discipline

Why it wins here

The Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art takes this question at €800 — €200 under the €1,000 ceiling — with a 94% match against 65 current lenses. For landscapes the engine leans on sharpness and build & sealing: it scores 92/100 and 75/100, where the pool averages 82/100 and 68/100. At 715 g it is heavier than the average lens here (633 g). No prime-or-zoom preference was required, so the whole pool of 65 was in play.

The dimensions where it beats the rest of the field by the most, for this question specifically.

  • Budget
  • Use

What's good

  • Clinical 1:1 sharpness for product and insects
  • Aperture ring and proper sealing

What to watch

  • Focus-by-wire feel divides macro purists
  • No OS — tripod or IBIS advised

What came close — and what each gave up

Questions this answer raises

Is the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art within a €1,000 budget?
Yes. At €800 it leaves €200 of the ceiling unspent; the Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR costs €950 and the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS costs €1,000.
How good is the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art for landscapes?
On the use question it scores 88%, 25 points above the average of the 65 lenses ranked. Its strongest numbers for this use are sharpness (92/100) and build & sealing (75/100).
What comes closest to the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art for landscapes?
The Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR at 93%, then the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS at 92%. The section above names the measure each one lost on.

Change an assumption

This page answers one photographer's question. Yours is not that question — adjust the subject, the format or the budget and watch the whole field re-rank.

Answer for your own shooting